PFB Members on … The World Series 0

Here at Prayers For Blowouts we love to let our members spout off their opinions on anything and everything. Recently we asked for their thoughts on what should be changed with the World Series. Here’s what they had to say:
——————————
There’s not much you can do about the games going into November, especially with the multiple rounds of playoffs. And you can’t do a whole lot about the games starting late; TV ratings are everything these days. We can, however, fix the issue of conflicting league rules when it comes to the Designated Hitter. The answer is simple: abolish the DH in the American League. (And, yes, I still oppose the DH rule even though the Yankees lost a pitcher on the base paths this year.)
The real World Series issue that needs to be addressed is how we can keep Tim McCarver from announcing the games. The person with a solution to that problem deserves his own federal holiday.
——————————
I think it’s ridiculous that these games start this late. Most blue collar Americans have jobs that require you to get up at a pretty early hour. I really feel bad for kids though. I can just imagine parents telling their 7 year old, “We’re sorry, but after the fifth inning it’s bedtime.”
——————————
I think we need to fix the games being played in frigid weather, and creeping into November.
We can fix this with more double headers.
——————————
Most definitely the late starting times for the games. With our ever-more shortened attention spans, baseball is a tough game to watch start to finish even for a Series game and if the start times were earlier, more people could tune in for potential late-inning drama, increasing the games’ relevance via the watercooler effect (more people actually talking about what they watched rather than just catching the summary on espn the next day).
——————————
The first thing I would change is the home-field advantage rule. I’m just not a fan of giving home-field advantage to the winner of the All Star game. I know, I know: it makes the All Star game more exciting; the players won’t bother trying (or even coming) if there’s nothing at stake; etc etc.
I recognize these as valid reasons in favor of the current rule. I just think the reasons on the other side–the reasons against letting the All Star game determine home-field advantage–are stronger. Much stronger.
First, everyone knows that making the starting lineup in the MLB All Star game is the equivalent of winning a high school popularity contest. I don’t think there’s any need for me to rehash examples of fan all-star balloting run amok.
This obviously shapes the game in a big way. Simply put, the best players don’t always make the team. How can something as important as home-field advantage in the Series be decided by ‘all stars’ who aren’t even the best in the league at what they do?
Second, I don’t care what anyone says, most guys who play in the All Star game still aren’t going to give their 100% maxed-out all. How often do you see players sprawl out at full speed for line drives in the All Star game? Or throw themselves into the stands chasing a foul? Hardly ever. And to be perfectly honest, I’m not sure we can blame them. A good number of them already have a pretty solid idea that their team isn’t headed for the Fall classic. Why risk injury so the Red Sox or Yankees (or whoever) get to play an extra game at home in October? You know that if you were an all star from a bottom-dwelling team, that question would probably be popping into your mind …
There’s just too much at stake here; home field advantage in the Series is important. At least important enough to justify a less ad hoc method of determining who gets it. Here’s a scandalous thought: Let the team with the best record (gasp!) have home-field advantage in October. Nuff said.
——————————
If you’d like to become one of the elite Prayers For Blowouts Members, just send your name, favorite team, and a headshot to prayersforblowouts(at)gmail.com. Membership is still free for anyone who loves sports, so what are you waiting for? We want you to hear what you have to say!


I know I agree with ticked off Phillies fans that stopping the game in the middle of the 6th inning was wrong. Why make the Phillies pitch and play defense in the 6th but not the Rays? If you knew you were going to resume the game anyway, why not just end it after the 5th? It seems to me that Selig was hoping the Rays would tie it up in the top of the 6th and that the Phillies would not score in the bottom of the 6th. Then he could suspend the game after 6 innings with it tied. He got the first half of his wish, when Pena singled in Upton with 2 outs, but when the Rays came out for the bottom, the field was laughably unplayable. He had no choice but to halt play. To me, the decision came 3 outs too late.



The World Series is over and the Boston Red Sox are your World Champions (although, my wife asked me last night why they called themselves the World Champions when they don’t play teams from outside North America and I didn’t have a good answer. It is a bit of a misnomer)
9. Jon Lester gave up more runs than he had strikeouts.- Lester had 3 strikeouts and gave up no runs in 5 and 2/3 innings. He pitched a great game.
I made 20 Post-Game comments before Game 2 started last night.
The fun begins tonight around 8pm, when the Rockies return to action against the Red Sox of Boston.
3. If Joe Buck says the word “jub-jub” during one of the telecasts,